‘Jews are Hereditary Degenerate

‘Jews are heriditary degenerate’ according to Richard Kraft-Ebing, who alongside many others came to the conclusion that the jewish race is inbred and because of this – delusional, insane and perverse. They suffer Neurasthenia, which ‘effects the jews with exceptional severity’. Jewish criminologist Cesare Lambroso claimed that 1 in 391 jews was a lunatic, which back in those days was four times higher than any other religion. These observations penned over a hundred years ago linked jews, inbreeding, disease and degeneracy.

This inbreeding is a phenomenon similar to that observed in certain highly aristocratic and wealthy families, whose members, whether from motives of honor or money constantly intermarry, and thus have many insane relatives” (Krafft-Ebbing).

Jews have been suffering type 1 and 2 diabetes for a not longer than Aryan man; diabetes was once called a judenkrankheit (a jewish disease). Because of a work project, I have been looking into type 2 diabetes and for those who did not know, as I did not, stress and diabetes go hand in hand. Under stress your body releases chemicals and glucose to get ready for fight or flight, but if the stress becomes chronic, we do not use up the glucose and the body has to store it, instead of using the fight or flight measures of protection. This results in high blood sugar, causing diabetes. This is something that was only seen en masse in jews a hundred years ago, but not in Europeans. Several scholars associated diabetes with jews and inbreeding.

The list to the right shows other nervous diseases that are more prevalent within the jew. I mention this because the incidence of mental health problems and diabetes are so well correlated, and both a big jewish problem for such a long time now, but a relatively recent problem for the European. Krafft-Ebing highlighted that the jews were not only suffering insanity from their religious delusions and inbred genetics, but were sexually perverse at a percentage very disproportionate with the Europeans they lived amongst. Although I may add I am suspicious that some jews themselves have clearly stated how mentally and physically ill they were in comparison to the Aryan, I assume they were (and still are) just getting in there to alter the reasoning for this phenomenon, like the jews are in foreign environments, often in overcrowded cities and of course there is their constant need to move as they have never been given an opportunity to settle, anti-semitism etc. 

Other reasons for the fact that jews are more at risk of nervous diseases are: their religion requires more leisure time and they eat very rich foods. So in other words, they are unhealthy and lazy. We have an overwhelming amount of evidence that shows diabetes and overall ill health are linked to not exercising and eating food that is fatty, without any nutritional value. Environmental factors today, such as over eating and lack of exercise, are valid reasons for poor physical and mental well-being. But this correlation matches the environment of today, not 1880-1940.

However, whether it was a jewish academic or not recording these findings, the lists of illnesses that are higher within the jewish community is sometimes doubled statistically, so putting aside for a moment the causes for the correlations, the findings are there, and across the board shows that jews have poor mental and physical health at noticeably higher rates.

So the explanation from jews is mostly an environmental one. However, a few scholars claimed that the higher rates of mental and physical illness was in fact an internal one because of intermarriage. Although people debate what they meant by ‘inbreeding’, some scholars argue that inbreeding meant intermarry within one’s own tribe, not within one’s own immediate family or one’s close blood line. The word consanguineous alone can simply mean ancestry or ethnic descent, but in this context of marriage it means ‘blood’, so it is pretty clear that many scholars meant close family:

Some jewish scholars have defended the inbreeding and said  it has aided the extraordinary IQ attributed to jews and that we should observe and learn from such cultural understandings. When presenting the evidence that jews are inbred and diseased, this is not flippancy or anti-semitism. Many academics of that time were disclosing how ‘hysteria’ and ‘intermarrying’ was commonplace amongst jews.

Not only is the jewish man’s mind attacked, but their body is discussed as often being misshaped and their feet flat footed, to the point were they could not uptake any physical activity, or be of any military value to the nation. Again the reasons given were that they were city dwellers, and it is debated whether or not with appropriate exercise their body would adapt to becoming one that can manage physical activity. Tay Sachs is a disease that jewish people often suffer, which is defined as “an inherited metabolic disorder in which certain lipids accumulate in the brain, causing spasticity and death in childhood”.

We are now told today that these views are outdated and inaccurate, but it was not just Kraepelin and Ebing supporting these views; many scholars from philosophy, medicine, psychiatry as well as religious figures gave their opinions, as well as jewish men themselves verifying the numbers of the ill and insane. Today we still have higher numbers of disease within the jew (and all immigrants for that matter), although the European men are fast catching pace living in the jews’ world, not only with their insanity and mental and physical illness, but with their highlighted lust for sexual perversions.

The accurate stereotype of the jew had been documented as ignorant, dirty and deviant, but then along came Freud to save them all by simply stating we were all like that. How silly of us! Phew, jew, that was a close one, we nearly thought you were all mentally and physically broken and soulless, possibly because you were all inbred. It seems, though, we were wrong and it is a good thing we are learning from the cultural enrichment that you so wonderfully offer us.

On mass degeneracy:

Emil Kraeplin suggested that hereditary degeneration among jews was most likely caused by their preference for consanguineous marriage. A syllogism is operating here: The insane are degenerates; the jews are insane; therefore the jews are degenerate.”

Scholars today may fight over the meaning of inbred, whether they meant tribe, second cousin or first, but the meaning of degenerate back then was conclusive; criminally sexually perverse with no morality. How odd to have that one word describe the jew, and its ending ‘generate’ describes me and you:

Generate; to bring into existence; cause to be; produce / to create by avital or natural process / to create and distribute vitally and profusely. 

Advertisements

White Supremacy Causes Premature Births in Black Women

April 16, 2016  Renegade Tribune

Yes, you did read that right. Your whiteness, your privileged position in the western world, is causing stress and anxieties to black women in European and American countries. You, as a white person, are causing what is called an ‘unmanageable allostatic load’ upon a black woman. Of course these could be blatant acts of racism of which we are aware, however they are mostly not, and because of this, that racism might even have to be pointed out to the black affected person, as they did not even notice it themselves.

Being black in America is bad for a woman’s health. Why? Chronic racism over the lifetime of African-American women affects their birth outcomes.” (Taylor, 2009, thegrio)

These negative outcomes are apparently due to our micro aggressions towards black people, but the blatant acts by our past and living relatives, as well as ourselves, are also a cause, because through generational ‘weathering’ a constant stress has been put upon a person throughout their life, which has effected the pregnancies of blacks, their children and grandchildren, passed down from mothers to daughters, with stress from racial discrimination beginning in the womb.

Racism, and its ability to increase the odds that a pregnant mother will deliver her child early, can kill. There is also evidence that racism can alter the capacity for a child to learn and distorts lives in ways that can reproduce inequality, poverty and long-term disadvantage, the studies found.” (Ross, 2013)

 The physiology of sexist and racist oppression, pages 108-109  explains fully the ideas of racism upon Black pregnancies, how it occurs generationally as well as currently. These few pages are worthy of a read if you are interested in this subject.

After writing a previous article on steroid injections for pregnant women who are supposedly at risk of pre term labour, I saw that African American women were on every “at risk” list I viewed. This got me curious as to why (silly naive me). I mentioned it to my partner and he said that black women and Asian women have less gestational periods than white women. So, I looked into it and it appears that women of Black descent, regardless of if they are in their own country or not, are pre-term in comparison to white European women.

Palel et al (2004)  found that, “Black and Asian Women may have shorter pregnancy duration compared with white European Women.” The compiled research found that whilst looking at Black , Asian and White women throughout Britain, that “This research suggests that normal gestational length is shorter in Black and Asian Women compared with white European Women and that fetal Maturation may occur earlier”. The evidence to support their conclusion is that there is often meconium in the waters of Black Women when they are pre term. Meconium is when a child has loosened their bowels into their amniotic fluid. Of course, you got me – it is because baby is stressed, not mature, silly racist me! However, these babies who are pre term with meconium in the water can hold their heads up within a day or two. The physical strength differences in White and Black infants is quite astonishing, proving without a doubt racial differences do exist.

I am sure a lot of people may know that there were gestational differences, but I did not. More so, I did not know that white people were  a linked contributing factor, which pissed me off a little considering, being 36 years old, my brainwashing (sorry, schooling) raised me to be colour-blind, to think black people were cool, friendly and in fact possibly smarter and definitely better than me, and I should go home and lecture my family about their out of date racist ways, whilst swooning over my posters of Will Smith and Warren G, and playing Snoop Doggy Dogg in some rebellious act of freedom for them. I was essentially over loving, out of being handed a plate full of misplaced slavery guilt, which has remained with a lot of lefty libtards who are yet to see that they were duped.

Early Motherhood<br />U.S. has the highest rate of teen birth in the world: 41.9 live births per 1,000 teens (age 15-19) g...

According to WHO, highest pre-term babies by Countries (at rates of 100 live premature births) are: Malawi at 18, Comoros at 16, congo at 16, Zimbawwe at 16, Equatorial Guinea at 16, Mozambique at 16, Gabon at 16, Pakistan at 15, Indonesia at 15 and Martama at 15. Notice anything similar about these countries? Like ethnicities?

Also these countries have fairly high teen pregnancies, for example, Malawi had 143 births per 1000 to girls aged 15-19 in 2011, Nigeria had 118. I mention this because one correlating factor I noticed between black women and premature births was teenage pregnancy, and that after having one premature pregnancy the likelihood of having another premature pregnancy is higher. If the second pregnancy is in the teenage years this will then become a high risk for extremely premature births.

whereas the racial disparity in extreme pre term birth could be partially explained by disparate access to medical care or other environmental variables, our data suggest that the proposed genetic component of pre term birth may be a greater etiological contributor than previously recognized, because racial differences in preterm birth severity and recurrence persist in this cohort, even after adjusting for known  medical and socioeconomic confounders” (Kistka ZA-F et al, 2007).

So Kistka and others, after compiling their study, believe after ‘adjusting’ environmatal factors from the study, that genetics were the main contender of Black women having consecutive pre term babies. Black mums are also more likely to have ‘more than one’ (1998, Center for Law and Social Policy) in their teenage years. According to this study, it is 26.7%, in comparison to white girls who are 19%. I would not contribute teenage pregnancy as being the only factor, but I believe it is one very worthy of highlighting, since statistically there are more risk factors upon a Black Woman than a White Woman because she is sexually active earlier, in African, European, and American countries. Earlier activity obviously leads to earlier pregnancies.

By the time Black females are 20 years old, 67% have been pregnant at least once (Joined Economic Comitee, 1994). Birth rates for Black teenagers varied by state, ranging from 103.9 per 1000 15-19 year olds to 217.9 per 1000, as compared with a range of 46 per 1000 to 105.6 per 1000 for white teenagers (Center for Disease Control, 1993)” (Kagawa-Sinegr, 1996)

Although numbers have declined since the nineties I have taken this quote because we need to understan those years, which brought about the ideas we have today. The ‘environmental factors’ like racism, which are deemed pre term risk factors, were discussed (invented) at the time when those were the birth statistics for teenagers. Our Jewish elites and paid idiots (some willing, others unfortunate) will gather ‘philosophical wisdom’, better known as bullshit, that claims conclusions of ‘whiteness’ (otherwise known as theoretical nonsense) to give black people ammunition in their hatred for us… sorry, not us, the social construct of whiteness.

Correlating stress factors are domestic abuse, overall family violence, low incomes and lack of education, and being pregnant and facing single parenting. As I said, this could all be explained with the terms ‘white oppression’, creating an overall stressor upon Black people as  a whole in their low socio economic status. So everything on their list of contributing risk factors can be directly put back to the white man’s privileged oppressive society, in retarded theory land.

I would also like to touch upon the discrepancy of overall pregnancy lengths. A huge research study found that “gestation varied by as much as 37 days…five weeks of variability” (BBC News, 2013). The average Premature Median being 33 weeks for a White women and 31 weeks for a Black Women (coincidentally there is about the same gap in normal gestation differences).

Do we really know enough about gestational periods anyway? Researchers were rather shocked to find the five week difference. Of course when a child is born we can see if the baby needs support; this is a noticeable sign that a child is not ready. What I am asking is, are we wise enough about pregnancies overall? Statistics can be misleading because of this lack of knowledge. Just how many Black Women at high risk are being given harmful corticosteroid injections, multiple courses for something that is naturally occurring within their race? Harming themselves, and their baby sometimes weekly, with toxins that effect the mortality rate and health of infants after birth and for life.

My conclusion here is that we do not know as much as we think we do, and it has been hypothesized that racial discrimination is one of many causes, which in consequence has been jumped on, not just as one environmental factor, but THE environmental factor by a lot of angry black people. There are a lot of  blogs and books out there shouting about how white Europeans are causing Black women’s pregnancies harm and that all black people should be aware of this, because even if they do not see it themselves, whiteness must be pointed out.

whiteness1