Hitler: The Great Awakener

June 30, 2016  

From the very first time I saw a Hitler speech I was drawn in entirely by his presence – a presence recorded over eighty years ago. Hitler mesmerised me – his words, his actions, his fire, his everything. I am not alone in having been so transfixed.

I thought the limited clips they showed at school were ridiculous – the mutterings of the ‘evil man’ that we should all fear, the man who wanted only a blonde haired blue eyed race, when he himself had brown hair and brown eyes. No, actually Hitler had the most beautiful blue eyes, that according to his legend hypnotised people around him. My partner and son agree that Hitler has something that cannot be ignored, something that makes you want to be a part of him, his ideas, his strength, his very way of being. Throughout Hitler’s life he impressed and infatuated people. He motivated them, understood them, forgave them and inspired them. He breathed life into the lifeless.

Hitler knew how mankind had been weakened; how people had crumbled, had sinned and been shamed, had become who they weren’t, and had lived in vain. But Hitler did not write them off. He invigorated them, reminded them of who they were. He gave them something beautiful to build – a kinship, community and country. He showed the people that they were their country, and that their country was them.

I believe if a man is not building something, he is not living. My partner told me this truth; if we were to be a strong couple we must always be building together and always be focused on a goal that we shared. To always be in love we must build our life together.

For many Hitler was love at first sight. He asked them to build with him and build they did. Our so called leaders today only discuss our mess and how to make it less messy, but there is no passion in them. Like when Hitler was struggling for power, the politicians of today are bought by Marxist views and Jewish wallets. In our own circles we have confusion, misguidance and nothing to build. Hitler had a manifesto to grow mankind, but we have no such ideal. We have a past that we must learn from and merge into our own time. Hitler took the old and brought it into the new.

Hitler was named ‘The great Awakener’ by his people and Dr Goebbels had said of his beloved friend;

Like a shining star you appeared before our wondering eyes, you performed miracles to clear our minds, and in a world of scepticism and desperation, gave us faith

Many question how he made a nation fall in love with National Socialism, which is claimed to be a sexist regime that dictated to its men their path. However, women chose to use their ’emancipation’ to rid themselves of it, and with their men they used “democracy” to forego it. Women understood they would no longer be included in the man’s world and their duty was to nurture the smaller world. Both men and women happily voted to vote no more and to give themselves to their Fuhrer.

If any of you today believe that you actually have a vote, you are mistaken. Hitler gave his people no illusion of their involvement; he told the people his plans, and they believed in him. He was true to his words and did not give false hope, lies and manipulations. He did not promise to do things while campaigning and then fail to follow through once elected, unlike these men of today who are punch and jewdy politicians. They do not deserve your emotions and pretend votes in their rigged system.

This talk of how women vote, how men vote, and who should and should not be allowed to participate in ‘democracy’, is ridiculous, as it is all pretend. If a genuine ‘love’ does come along and us National Socialists rise again, the vote will be no more – no more for anyone. Hitler said trust me, and his people did. Do you trust your leaders enough to take away the vote you believe you have? I doubt it. You do not trust your leaders, yet you trust that your leaders will listen to you when you tick a box.

Gregor Strassor stated that;

A glowing faith in victorious strength of this doctrine of liberation, and deliverance is combined with a deep love of the person of our Fuhrer who is the shining hero of the new freedom fighter.

Now today’s literature will happily resign such adoration to propaganda and brainwashing, and say that Hitler feminized his entire nation by rendering them in love with him like a wife besotted with her husband. They also claim all love for Hitler was therefore sexual, because in the jew world love can only involve sex. Being astounded by beauty, being impressed by physique and having admiration for a person’s form, character or essence is all about fucking,and nothing more. A people cannot bask in the adoration of another without having to want to have sexual relations with them. And for argument’s sake, surely if he feminized his entire nation then he could not have been sexist, but we just have to look at his army to know that this is a very silly notion.

Hitler told his people he would build their nation and remove the degradation put upon them. They faced the same situation we do right now. We are being taught our only passion is for degeneracy and destruction, not to design and develop ourselves and our people, not to have them in love, but to have them lose all faith and heart in themselves and their people.

As I am a women I am particularly interested in what German women felt for their Führer and what he gave them to build. How he enthused them! Here is part of his speech in 1934 at the party rally of The National Socialist Women’s Organisation;

The slogan ‘the emancipation of women’ was invented by jewish intellectuals and its content was formed by the same spirit. In the good times of German life the German woman had no need to emancipate herself. She possessed exactly what nature had necessarily given her to administer and preserve; just as the man in his good times had no need to fear that he would be ousted from his position in relation to the woman.

Hitler continued his speech about our natural roles as men and women and said that our men create the larger world as our women imitate their values and care for the smaller world. Hitler discussed how the woman’s role is to sacrifice herself to her family. My partner was raised by his Grandmother and always spoke of her willingness to sacrifice, to always put herself last in line of food and clothing, and would do everything necessary for her children and home without an ounce of complaint; her duty was her soul and she would work her hands to the bone in and outside of the home to ensure the needs of her family were met. Hitler did not expect his women to serve outside of their home, and to drain their being to survive. Hitler gave great incentives to women and men financially and emotionally to be in relationships and be what nature intended for them – for a man to work and a women to nurture their young. Married men would be preferred for promotion over unmarried men, and women were to be given well-trained maternity support to help nurse the children. Hitler saw men and women as equally valued, but not the same. We have different abilities. Hitler gave women back their womanhood, which feminism attempted to steal.

Our National Socialist Women’s movement has in reality but one single point, and that point is the child, that tiny creature which must be born and grow strong and which alone gives meaning to the whole life struggle.

Frau Scholtz-Klink the leader of the National Socialist Women’s orgainzation, told her women;

The guiding principle of German women today is not to campaign against men but campaign alongside men.

I believe a woman should be at her man’s side and that she should carry and honour his word as he should carry and honour hers. I believe a couple in love should be united in thought and future goals. Hitler encouraged this. He united his people and gave them their natural duties to fulfill, and was loved for doing so.

Theodore Abel wrote a research book named Why Hitler Came Into Power. He was granted authority to ask Hitler’s nation the question ‘Why I became a National Socialist’. He gave an incentive of marks to the best essay response. He warned that dramatic over-represented claims were not what he was seeking, but normal and valuable reasoning would win the prize. This research is deemed flawed and inaccurate because of the methodology. Abel asked that people write of their experiences from before 1933, while his book was published in 1938. Here are some accounts from German women, whose reason was simply love, just as it was with the men.

‘Whoever has looked deeply into the Fuhrers eyes will never, not even years later forget such a powerful experience! I, who had never been able to recognise any authority over me at all… I will follow a life of obedience”

The joy inside me was impossible to describe. This simple man with a true, righteous gaze streamed warm sunlight from his face into the 22,000 hearts in the audience… whoever has a pure heart and hears our Fuhrer speak and looks into his eyes has no choice but to convert to him”

From a thousand wounds rose his sweet face, enlivened by a child like smile of holy self confidence. Hitler strengthens the spiritual power of the entire Volk”

Heaven gave us more than we deserved when it sent us the fanatical crusader of honour and freedom, Adolf Hitler”

The man who destiny and god have sent to heal a shattered Germany”

I realized that I had at last found my goal and desire. I felt as if a fire flamed within me and I said to myself you do not learn about national socialism, you have to experience it”

I would not be able to dress it up in words and could only say that National Socialism is anchored in the deepest inner being of every German, and expresses the most primitive sensitivities and emotions”

I would say that it is in every Aryan, and agree I felt it too. For footage from so long ago to still have captured the very essence of a man who brought souls back to life, can you imagine the power to have actually been present at that time? I believe I love my man so much and Hitler so much because they both understood something very simple: that a woman should build her home, a man should build their city, and they should both envision together how that city and home should look and feel. Man and woman should both be guided by the same ideals. A nation, and a couple, can only be in love when building something beautiful and meaningful. European man has to build to be great. This is why many immediately succumbed to his genuineness, like Herman Goring said:

From the first moment I saw him I belonged to him body and soul

The video above tells a small tale again of how Hitler made others feel. The youtuber also has lots of excellent videos worth checking out.


Jewish Agender

Heathen Women


Richard Von Krafft-Ebing, who wrote ‘Psycopathia Sexualis’ in 1886, discussed the bases of his own belief that sexual lust was engineered by procreation, that our sexual desire and drive complied with nature and that any other sexual behaviour was seen as unnatural and therefore sexual deviancy and a mental disorder. This book was pretty much a classification of insanity like our diagnostic manuals of psychological disorders today, which include paraphilia’s (unusual sexual behaviours). Krafft-Ebing used what he called Cerebral Neurosis to describe such insanity and claimed that the jewish people where rife with it. He stated:

View original post 1,373 more words

Take Your Children Back

Heathen Women


Traditional education, as they call it, is an educational setting that sits your children down and tells them to repeat lies. It takes away any desire to learn away from your children and builds layer upon layer of barriers in which a person does not want to learn. They desire the opposite, to be left alone, and are unwilling to learn. Some are lucky and keep the thirst for knowledge, others may find it again someday, but most hare happy in ignorance. The only thing children consciously learn, is not to.

View original post 963 more words

Steroid Injections during Pregnancy: Harmful

Antenatal Steroid Injections Cause Harmful Effects

Antenatal steroid treatment is an injection of corticosteroid given in one of the large muscles of mom; either arm, leg or bottom, and it travels into the baby’s blood stream from mom. The reason for this is a threat of pre term labour, also known as premature delivery. The concern is that the baby’s lungs in particular are immature, so the injection is used to mature the lungs and increase survival rates.

It is thought that one dose of injections proves to help the baby’s progression, as it speeds up the lungs’ maturation and prepares the baby for birth. Multiple doses of injections, for example weekly, can have ill effects on the baby. There has been no data to suggest safety of weekly doses given, and plenty to show harm, but they are given to moms deemed at risk of premature labour.

The image to the right shows how a lot of people are “at risk”, and it is down to your good old obstetrician to make the decision if you need one, two or even more doses of steroids. It is called predictive prematurity, when they take all of the data and conclude your risk outcome.

So how harmful are steroids? After reading up on the subject, I have come to the conclusion, like with most things in healthcare, when used correctly at the right time, they will save lives at a risk. As usual though, trends start and things get out of hand.

Interventions that can be harmful are quite common, and this is another one.

First of all let’s look at the ingredients within the Corticosteroid injection, starting with Dexamethasone;

Each ml of solution contains 3.3 mg dexamethasone (as sodium phosphate) which is equivalent to 4 mg dexamethasone phosphate or 4.3 mg dexamethasone sodium phosphate…Excipients: Sodium citrate, disodium edetate, sodium sulphite anhydrous (E221), Water for Injections, sodium hydroxide and hydrochloric acid.” (Electrical Medical Compendium).

Sodium Hydroxide is well known for its abilities to break down tissues and was once used to dispose of dead animal flesh, as it will turn the body to liquid, so it is no surprise it is a hazardous toxin that causes burns and is a known poison. If ingested, inhaled or touched medical attention should be sought.

Sodium Citrate is a preservative derived from fermented sugars from corn which is probably GMO.

Disodium Edetate (EDTA) is cytotoxic which means it is harmful to cells. It reacts with other ingredients making them more easily absorbed into the skin. Surprise, surprise it is linked with infertility.

Hydrochloric acid is an irritant which can cause lung damage when exposed to the vapours. If you ingest, inhale or touch hydrochloric acid you must seek medical assistance, and it is incompatible with sulphites, causing a violent heat reaction.

Surely we could have these injections without, preservatives, gelling agents, toxic combinations to counteract each other, promote each other, or whatever the… each other?

In the leaflet for Dexamethasone made by, Hospira it says,

Administration of corticosteroids to pregnant animals can cause abnormalities of foetal development including cleft palate, intrauterine growth retardation and effects on brain growth and development” (Dexamethasone Patient Leaflet)

Some have blamed the sulphites themselves for these side effects,

Sulfite preservatives which are used in dexamethasone preparations…there is an increased neuronal death after exposure to pharmacological preparations of dexamethosona containing sulphites or to isolated sulphites” (Reece, Clinical Obstertrics,2007)

Reece then explains, as many of us anti-vaccine warriors are aware, that when toxins are injected they are more harmful. Many people who defend toxins in injections argue that you can swallow so many mgs without serious harm. This is because your stomach is defending you; injections bypass this system of defence, making them so much more more dangerous than if swallowed.

when dexamethasone is administered intravenously or intramuscularly, it reaches higher peak blood levels…these levels of dexamethasone may cause the observed neuronal damage.

Not only do they cause neuronal damage but research also;

found increased rates of neonatal and maternal infections, fetal, neonatal and maternal adrenal suppression, decreased fetal and neonatal sematic and brain growth, and increased perinatal mortality” (Stokowski, 2004, Controversies in using steroids; From fetus to newborn).

McLaughlin et al, in 2003 found that pregnancies did not benefit from corticosteroid treatment and that the infants were three times higher the risk of mortality.

What does show up in every animal study is ‘Myelin damage, myelin is an insulation of nerve fibres, ‘white matter’. It is thought that it maintains communication through distant body parts. Without it you are at risk of neurodegenerative auto-immune disorders.

A surprisingly diverse range of psychiatric and nervous system disorders are accompanied by changes in white matter structure or abnormalities in myelin genes (see Box 1). Polymorphisms for several myelin genes have emerged as unexpected risk factors for schizophrenia [3,4], depression [4] and obsessive-compulsive disorder [5]. Post mortem examination of brain tissue from patients suffering schizophrenia [4,6], major depression [7] and bipolar disorder” (Fields, 2008).

Not only does this injection cause harm to the working of the brain, but the size can be physically smaller. Animal studies have repeatedly shown negative effects upon the morphological (which means the form of), the physiological, (which is the living organism), and the behavioural. Other side effects reported have been lung disease, cerebral palsy, low birth weights and infant and maternal infections.

This injection can interfere with every part of the infant, on every level, and even be fatal. This evidence is readily available, yet we still have the ‘infatuation’ warned by Doctors back in 2004, over ten years ago, with multiple uses of this drug, which is proven ineffective and harmful. Many agencies claim in light of research that what is called ‘rescue therapy’ or multiple courses, should be abandoned (Stokowski,2004), yet…

According to the American college of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG), a repeated course of steroids is acceptable if previous treatment was completed over 14 days prior, but only before 34 weeks gestation …7 days prior and before 26 weeks in Britain”(Romjeko-Wolniewicz et al,2014),

The reason given for this is because;

there is evidence that the effectiveness of antenatal corticosteroids diminishes with time, so if birth has not occurred within seven days of corticosteroid administration it is common practice to administer a second course of corticosteroids” (Sheilds et al, 2012).

Well, the effects that they deem positive (the lung maturation) may wear off, but the negative effects of the injection itself, upon sheep for example, lasted until adulthood.

There are discussions about dexamathasone not being used and betamethasone being used, as it has lower side effects, but studies I have discussed used both drugs. Dexamethosone is still being used and administered although cited as more harmful in relation to betamethasone, which is why I chose dexamathasone to discuss, because I think the fact it is still in use when noted as more harmful is disgusting. However, the baboon study by Sheild used both drugs and found both singular and multiple doses of these drugs harmful to brain matter.

Again we have a preventative measure, which used in emergencies could save a baby’s life, but we have unsupported evidence to promote multiple use. In that situation, a single dose giving a side effect of “myelene damage” to a lesser degree than multiple courses should be the family’s decision, not the obstetrician’s. I understand this is difficult, when you have a family in pre term labour at 28 weeks, you want to prolong the labour and administer steroids to promote immediate maturation of the lungs so the baby survives labour and the following weeks after. Do they have time in such a small window to give the parent all of this information?

These are all problems that we need to deal with when administering medications which on application whether singly or multiply have these harmful effects;

Both single and repeated courses of corticosteroids caused astrogliosis in the subcortical and deep white matter”(Sheilds,2012).

Astrogliosis is when the central nervous system is damaged because of mass destruction to nearby neurons. Astrogliosis is mostly seen in stroke victims.

I will leave you with this quote by sheilds (2012), as it seems this is where the discussion is at, nowhere;

whether obstetricians should continue to give repeated course of corticosteroids remains controversial”(Sheilds,2012).

Damn straight, and damn wrong.

We need to start asking questions and applying pressure about why our children are having toxins enter their systems so readily, we need to make good people feel uncomfortable, by asking questions they cannot answer or ignore, and that they will then need to research themselves because we have made them.

I am getting more and more disgusted at the state of our antenatal healthcare, and I hope you are too.

Gender Blind Parenting

So we are now on the verge of becoming a gender neutral society, where all limits are off and anybody can be anything. Only you can’t, because you need a womb to physically give birth to a child. Maybe you could just decide to be something else that’s being offered; there is so much to chose from. You can just hope there is a family out there who will have their child taken away and then given to you, in your new body of altered gender. Awesome, it’s all sorted then. Freedom here we come.

Gender questionaireThis form to the side, highlighting question 13, was given to pupils aged 13-18 in a British school, surveying what children think and feel about their gender roles.

This school has also sent out a letter alongside the children who are enrolling in the new school year September placements, that when they tick the male or female box that;

“We recognise that not all children and young people identify with the gender they were assigned at birth or may identify as a gender other than male or female, however the current systems (set nationally) only record gender as male or female.” (The Telegraph, 20th April, 2016).

These children are between the ages of four and five. Now I am pretty sure if you asked a child of this age what they identify most with, a boy or a girl, they will probably say a transformer or a fairy, like a woodland fairy, not as in a gay terminology for fairy, as luckily they are yet to receive their sex education at the ages of 5-8, and may so far be unaware that fairy is a politically incorrect term for a homosexual man.

I would also like to just add, when I was attending school, I cannot recall it ever saying gender on a form. The box said sex, and as a teenager it was lots of fun to write, yes please. I am sure teachers must have read it often. So did this change happen to create yet more discussions around gender?

According to the school and council, they had been requested by parents to address this issue. This I found unbelievable. But are these parents reading or being taught of this new hip gender-blind parenting style?

Today we are faced with the lunacy of non-gender parenting, also called gender neutral parenting, where some parents dress their child in a way that their gender can be unknown. They even have gone to the extreme of not telling other people whether their child is a boy or a girl, so as not to confuse the child, if the child is maybe, perhaps, could be, or has the potential to be confused later on. Oh, I think the confusion has been ensured. Because the thing is, gender is a social construct, it is oppressive and harmful, it is limiting and expectant, say the psychoanalyst child psychologists.

“these advisers say parents should not only permit but encourage children to move beyond gender stereotypes for their own good and/or the good of the society” (Contemporary readings in sociology, Korgen, 2007)

This saying “move beyond” normally means getting past something massive and hindering that is in the way. So is our sex, in our way, hindering us? Apparently yes, like everything I look into, feminism just crops up, and feminism in this case, argued and highlighted the need to redirect parenting into showing our children that they should have choices, lots of them, that they should not be happy to grow up as girls or boys, who naturally want to nurse babies or wield swords. Taking away the little boys cars, soldiers, bikes and tools and giving them a pink frilly dress, a pram, a baby doll, and no boys stuff at all. This though, is not neutral; it is the opposite of neutral, it is enforcing the opposite gender, and why would they be doing such a thing?

“Perhaps, then it is not about nature (our biology) at all but about how we are raised in society, called nurture. Is this the all important deciding factor in placing a person in the girl or boy box?” (Gender Neatral Parenting, Lucas-Stannard) and then goes on to say, “gender identity can range from girl to boy to those that feel they have no gender or many genders. I like to call this the gender identity garden for it’s beautiful array of unique varieties”.

She makes it all sound so pretty. I am not saying that some boys cannot play with girls stuff, as my children fight over each other’s toys all of the time. My problem is the silliness of trying to direct an outcome; being so open to the fact that your child is not going to be normal, is sickening. This is the truth of what this is, being open to abnormality, thinking it is cool to have such abnormality. Are they really saying they are happy their child will not give them grandchildren, that they will also have a massive risk of mental health problems, that as much as they try to feel included, they will not be, because it is not normal to want to be another sex; it is rare, far rarer than we are being taught it is. For the children who are growing up lost, undirected, unenthused and alone in this sick society, they are being given another box to jump into for salvation, another label they may hope to find themselves in, because we are all trying to find something, and the elite Jew is giving out options left, right and center for where we can try to find ourselves.

I sat with my two children last month or so and we were watching how babies progress and develop in the womb and for the first year. It was totally undirected, as we were just browsing together and chatting, and we naturally came across the subject. My son when realizing that he could not grow babies in his belly cried. He is quite a sensitive young fellow, and from my experience working with young children, I have found most boys are, and girls are the opposite, until they get older, and then it reverses. I am saying this generally and not as a rule, but an observation; if others note this observation, will all boys be deemed a target for showing early symptoms of gender confusion? Anyway, I explained to my crying son that he was the male viking warrior and that he held the seeds, and he would find an honorable girl to give them too, and she would grow the seeds in her belly, that this baby would be his, and then when his baby is born we could take the baby to the park together and play with his baby, because he would be a wonderful daddy. Now, this conversation, from what insanity I can gather, is me controlling my son’s gender outcome and not allowing him to choose for himself. Apparently my views are ‘neurosexist’. I would have believed you could not make this shit up, but somebody has.

Thankfully after a trip to the town, my son was running around with an army helmet and a sword and my daughter with a wrapped up baby in her arms. I did not choose these toys for them; I allowed them to pick whatever they wanted. And on returning home my daughter attacked us all with a sword and my son put the baby to sleep in the pram, but I was proud watching people goo over my beautiful children as they happily walked around portraying their natural sex, their healthy gender roles and picking toys to mimic the roles that women and men typically embody, and hearing people comment on my ‘handsome little soldier’ and ‘pretty little mum’.

So, this is where we are, enforcing their true gender is wrong, enforcing the opposite gender is right and if we do encourage their sexual identity in a ‘gender blind’ world, we are taking away the options of our children. How much more of our own nature can we reject before we all wake up I wonder.

“We strive to be color-blind and gender-blind, while remaining culturally sensitive and in touch with common sense” (Maximum Strength Parenting, Vaughn, 2007).

Cool, I was worried for a minute. I thought this was non logical and insensitive to my culture, silly me. Here is an idea, instead of preparing for our children to be transgender, bi gender, gender fluid, genderqueer or all genders, we could just spend a load of time with them, playing, chatting, understanding them, and we will soon find out if they want a doll, a sword, a dress, or a toy gun, and whilst doing so, instead of naming them ‘they’ and cross dressing them for the first few years of their lives, build a foundation of trust with them, in which when they are older, if there was anything weird going on, they could openly tell us, and somehow we will deal with it all together. But to be so willing for a child to have problems can only lead me to the assumption that the elite Jew has given us all such a thirst for attention that we are degraded to this, to wanting a child that is gender confused. As I see it, to be so prepared is to be willing. This is not a parenting win, this is a fail.

Is Ultrasound Safe and Sound?

Is Ultrasound Safe and Sound?

There is plenty of evidence to suggest an array of correlations between ultrasound and harm. However, we are still being scanned for longer and more frequently throughout one gestational period, at home with a Doppler or in store with new 3d imaging machines.

Why be concerned?

Thermal effects are ultrasound waves absorbed and converted into thermal energy. In other words, waves become heat on contact.

The evidence to suggest potential harm was raised by Dr. Mendelsohn in the eighties. He requested to look at research held by WHO (the World Health Organisation) and his comment soon after was this:

Ultrasound produces at least two biological effects, heat and a process called ‘cavitation’ in which bubbles are created that expand and contract in response to sound waves.  The first time I saw this cavitation process in action, a chiropractor turned on the therapeutic ultrasound machine in his office and placed a few drops of water on the part of the machine that was applied to the patient. I wish every reader…could have been with me to watch that water suddenly boil and bubble.” (The People’s Doctor, Vol.7, No. 11, p.  3).

There is also a video link here in which he directly discusses his concerns about leukemia and cancer:    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YfaUQCp6L1s

If you look at the links underneath the video you will find further reading which I thought was great of the YouTube sharer to add.

During my investigation into ultrasounds I found research by Eugenius S. B. C. Ang, Jr., Vicko Gluncic, Alvaro Duque, Mark E. Schafer, and Pasko Rakic. This research was up for review in 2005 and publicised in 2006. They found that:

Neurons of the cerebral neocortex in mammals, including humans, are generated during foetal life in the proliferative zones and then migrate to their final destinations by following an inside-to-outside sequence. The present study examined the effect of ultrasound waves (USW) on neuronal position within the embryonic cerebral cortex in mice. We used a single BrdU injection to label neurons generated at embryonic day 16 and destined for the superficial cortical layers. Our analysis of over 335 animals reveals that, when exposed to USW for a total of 30 min or longer during the period of their migration, a small but statistically significant number of neurons fail to acquire their proper position and remain scattered within inappropriate cortical layers and or in the subjacent white matter. The magnitude of dispersion of labelled neurons was variable but systematically increased with duration of exposure to USW. These results call for a further investigation in larger and slower-developing brains of non-human primates and continued scrutiny of unnecessarily long prenatal ultrasound exposure.

To briefly outline the above, mice were exposed to ultrasound throughout their gestational period, the foetus’ suffered neural migration; neurons failed to reach their correct position. This research showed a direct link between ultrasound and brain damage.

In page eighty of the book medico-legal radiology Pasko Rakic is quoted;

We should be using the same care with ultrasound as with x-rays.

The picture above shows a noticeable difference, as you can see the green (BrdU injected) neurons did not get to the superficial layers; there is clumping at the bottom and overall scattering unlike the brains without ultrasound exposure. The team compiling this study noted that without microscopes they could see which mice had been exposed. The difference was easily detectable.

The critique is obvious; we are not mice and have less fragile tissue (Sonography in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2010) and they were subjected to longer time periods and at that time it was a higher frequency. Since then, however, frequency levels have been raised in strength since this experiment was reviewed (WHO).

Midwifery Today (Issues 50, 51,1999, Issue 80, 2006) has highlighted the researchers who have found correlations with ultrasound and learning difficulties such as autism, dyslexia, epilepsy, left handedness, speech delays, schizophrenia, and particularly higher percentage in boys than girls. Weight abnormalities in organs and birth weights recorded are referred to as growth retardation. Doctors have queried leukaemia and cancer as cavitation consequences. Neural migration and DNA damage have been highlighted in research. Ultrasound practitioners have a higher rate of miscarriage and a correlation with longer working hours was noticeable.

Misdiagnosis shows that interference has consequences. Babies are often born earlier and the survival rate is lower when practitioners were aware of problems. Babies actually have a higher rate of survival when undiagnosed in the womb. A study from Oslo (Skari et al., 1998) of prenatal women concluded that foetuses;

had diaphragmatic hernias, abdominal wall defects, bladder extrophy or meningomyelocele… Three out of the thirteen babies diagnosed antenatally died. There was one death in the twenty-three undiagnosed. All thirteen babies with antenatal diagnosis were delivered by caesarean. Nineteen of the twenty-three undiagnosed babies had an uncomplicated vaginal delivery” (Midwifery Today, 1999)

Misdiagnosis has also led to babies being aborted as parents have been guided to believe there child would be physically disabled and unable to live independently at any point. They have been advised to take the option to terminate the pregnancy, so when they say “there are options,” they mean they will discuss and encourage abortion. Families have aborted babies looking perfectly able-bodied who were wrongly diagnosed; the babies would have been healthy children without intervention (Lifenews.com, 2012, Lifesite, 2007). If you research this you will find many individual accounts.

If the practitioners deem the pregnancy to be terminated, consent is not discussed and orders are given as to what will happen next. One mom had been told her baby had no heartbeat and her option was to take a pill to speed up the miscarriage or come back in two weeks if she had not miscarried. The mom decided to get a second opinion and another scan at a different hospital confirmed her baby was alive (Mail Online, 2013). In this case a scan saved her baby, but the first one nearly killed the foetus. If the mom did as she was told, she would be none the wiser, as many may have not been.

Today the buzzword in health and social care is ‘preventative’. If a person needs dietary intervention then great, give him nutritional advice that will help him lose weight, signpost exercise programmes, with some doctors even prescribing gym passes. “Preventative” here, in the correct circumstance, is a great idea. Preventative in the ideology that we treat every person the same and pull out all could be’s and what if’s is causing massive interference in prenatal and post-natal care. Births are bombarded with overly cautious beeping invasive technologies and women are to be strapped to a bed in agony with increased stress whilst practitioners sit around with machines and text books monitoring the stress of the baby. The people around the pregnant woman are barely there; they are in a world of graphs and numbers, with a midwife holding papers and not the mother’s hand. Surely chill the mom and chill the baby? Is everything science and not common sense? The point I am making is that intervention has become invasive, and according to much research, harmful.

We have to ask, are ultrasound scans necessary or harmful? I believe doctors do have a place in our world, that we need certain treatments at times, and that technology can be helpful. For example, a bleeding pregnant women with abdominal pain may be refused a scan, diagnosed as ectopic and be given a pill to terminate, but when a scan is carried out later because the woman has not miscarried, it is clear the baby was in the womb (not the tubes) and the termination drug was wrongly prescribed and has now given baby physical disabilities and an abortion is advised (New England Journal, Med, 2013). I know this looks like madness, not scanning when necessary and scanning when not. This is why women need to be fully informed of unbiased material on the research available so they can carry out their own risk assessment before deciding against or demanding upon an ultrasound. In normal routine scans to assess foetal growth I deem them unnecessary and harmful, but using them to see if I am ectopic, that my baby or myself is at fatal risk, I deem necessary. After I have understood and assessed the risks involved, for now at least, I realize that I do not understand enough and further research of updated material is always required.

As with most incompetence, upon further investigation, it seems that perhaps incompetence is trained, guided and managed perfectly well.