My article about bestiality may have disturbed your stomach, and this article may disturb your heart. Again, I believe awareness is essential to our cause. Truth is our ultimate goal. When researching the subject and original study plan, ‘the normalization of pedophilia’, it became pretty clear, pretty fast that homosexuals have a passionate voice, concern and need to promote sympathy for pedophiles. They write a lot, lobby a lot and try to push for the acceptance of pedophilia. In other words, many gay men want it to be considered morally acceptable to fuck boys. This is not the only form of child abuse, but these disgusting degenerates want to normalize their “relationships”, and because of this, all forms of abuse will become acceptable. Get ready to tolerate the intolerable; this is where we are standing.
The muddying of the waters became clear in 2013 when the DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) changed the classifications of Paraphilias as a whole. A Paraphilia is a non typical sexual behaviour. What they did with this was place a consensual clause in it.
For Pedophilia to be classed as a mental health disorder it must cause distress to yourself or another, injury or death to another, or have sexual desires about those unable or unwilling to consent. So in other words, like when they began normalizing homosexuality it came first with ‘comfortability’ – if you are comfortable being gay then it is not a disorder. It appears this is what is happening here. And just so you know, the same doctors who removed Homosexuality from the DSM are the same ones now fighting for pedophiles.
Well, there are lots of people comfortable with being a pedophile and were happily lobbying the DSM, asking that pedophilia be removed, and it almost was, but there was public disagreement. Thank the gods some of us can still say no.
However, I often think they push these things knowing it is too soon and people will not allow it, but gently, gently, the move has begun. B4U Act is an organisation, which has this as a mission statement:
To publicly promote professional services and resources for self-identified individuals (adults and adolescents) who are sexually attracted to children and desire such assistance
To educate mental health providers regarding approaches needed in understanding and responding to individuals (adult and adolescents) who are sexually attracted to children and who either seek or are referred for services regarding issues identified by such persons or by those referring them for services
To develop a pool of health care providers in Maryland who agree to serve individuals (adults and adolescents) who are sexually attracted to children, utilizing the therapeutic approaches advocated by the organization
To educate the citizens of Maryland regarding issues faced by individuals (adults and adolescents) who are sexually attracted to children
To undertake other projects, programs, and activities not inconsistent with Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, including the making of distributions to organizations that qualify as exempt organizations under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, as the need to do so presents itself in the opinion of the Board of Directors
The reason for such an organisation to exist of course is because:
Now, many experts view it as a sexual orientation as immutable as heterosexuality or homosexuality. It is a deep-rooted predisposition — limited almost entirely to men — that becomes clear during puberty and does not change “(Los Angeles Times).
I would be annoyed if I was a man today, when the world is beginning to believe that pedophilia is just a sexual orientation amongst mostly men.
Not all pedophiles molest children. Nor are all child molesters pedophiles. Studies show that about half of all molesters are not sexually attracted to their victims. They often have personality disorders or violent streaks, and their victims are typically family members.
By contrast, pedophiles tend to think of children as romantic partners and look beyond immediate relatives. They include chronic abusers familiar from the headlines — Catholic priests, coaches and generations of Boy Scout leaders.
Other pedophiles are “good people who are struggling,” said Dr. Fred Berlin, a psychiatrist who heads the Johns Hopkins Sexual Behaviors Consultation Unit. “They’re tortured souls fighting like heck not to do this. We do virtually nothing in terms of reaching out to these folks. We drive it underground.”
I think this is reoccurring, the, ‘we are different’, we love children, just like Zoophiles, wanting acceptance because ‘they’ are the victim in all of this. I think I have a cure; if you need to watch other people abuse children, or cannot help but do it yourself – jump off a cliff, you ARE harmful, you are dangerous, and I’d rather you die than them, everytime!
It is clear that there is a way of getting sexual deviance accepted by the wider society. They have a recipe; they claim it is innate, it is cultural and has a place throughout history, they argue against the belief that the effects are harmful to others, that the evidence to support harm is over represented and weak, they say it can be consensual and even pleasurable for the perpetrator’s victim, they explain how cannot it be a disorder if the person with the disorder does not feel they have a disorder, they argue people are only against it because of societal beliefs that are imposed on them, they say that the standards that are set are oppressing them and they need to be liberated from them. As people just cannot help being pedophiles and are born how they were born, like many before them and many to come. And quite frankly, it is our duty, to support them in living the best life they can, due to their painful biological predisposition.
If my biological predisposition was to hurt little people who are vulnerable and who depend upon us not to use them for sexual gratification, then I believe the last thing I would want is some fucking acceptance; I think I would want to die. Well, here lies the biggest selling feature – they are suicidal, they need therapy, and they need our compassion, and if we relax the laws on pedophilia, more people will come forward for help without the fear of punishment. Well, it is already becoming harder and harder to be seen as having a mental health disorder for pedophilia, and having sex with children isn’t even enough; you have to be more than a repeat offender and have a whole six months of thinking about sex with children in order to fit the criteria.
What we have here within the DSM is almost a ‘minor attraction’ card, that if you only desire children, are comfortable with it and don’t do much other than have a little look at pictures and CP (child porn), then maybe this is okay and there is nothing wrong with you. However, somebody takes those pictures, and somebody films those scenes, and somebody is being abused and exploited in that reel.
Homosexual journalist Luke Malone uses the term CP a lot instead of filmed sexual abuse. He discusses a man, an inactive self-proclaimed pedophile who fought with ‘his pornography habit’. In reality, he is illegally downloading sexually pervasive acts illegally filmed by criminals, containing victims of sexual rape and abuse and perpertraters who have mental health problems. These videos are put on the internet to be shared with more and more people with mental health problems, who become addicted to it and will likely one day act out what they see.
Yes, there is a direct link between watching ‘child porn’ and committing child abuse, but do you see how language can make something sound less sinister than it is? Referring to is as ‘child porn’ (not filmed sexual abuse) is helping to normalize it. You will also be hard pushed to find an immigration child abuse scandal, although not impossible, but very rare. Most say rape, gang rape, anal rape, and then the age of the child victim – a child of 10, or 3, or 11. They are normalizing sexual offences with children and terming them in the same way as with adults. It is sexual abuse and pedophilia, not rape. The homosexual is yearning not only for the abolishment of consensual ages so he can get his hands on your 11-14 years olds, their favourable age, but they are being helped, encouraged and used by the Jewish media to bring forward the normalization of the sexualization of children.
Back to the homosexual man being used for his filthy lust, these journalists like Malone and psychologists like James Canter attempt to drive into the mass an empathy with pedophiles. Canter is a homosexual sexologist/neurologist/psychologist, who “researched” the hardness of dicks of men watching ‘child porn’ and then looked for similarities within his subjects. He did this to come to the conclusion that it is not their choice, it is unavoidable for them and that social acceptance is needed, and therapy is the best way forward. So acceptance of non-offending pedophiles is healthier for society, so the argument goes, but who knows who is and isn’t offending?
The correlation between gay men and pedophilia is not a myth, but rather very well established:
Pedophilia appears to have a greater than chance association with two other statistically frequent phenomena. The first is homosexuality”(Pedophiles, Mental Retardation, Maternal Age, and Sexual Orientation, Blanchard et al)
The best epidemiological evidence indicates that only 2-4% of men attracted to adults prefer men. In contrast, around 25-40% of men attracted to children prefer boys. Thus the rate of homosexual attraction is 620 times higher among pedophiles.” (Fraternal Birth Order and Sexual Orientation in Pedophiles, Blanchard et al, 200)
The proportion of sex offenders against male children among homosexual men is substantially larger that the proportion of sex offenders against female children among heterosexual men.” (Heterosexuality, Homosexuality and Erotic Age Preference, Freund et al,1989).
In a 1988 study of 229 convicted felons who where child molesters, 86% of them described themselves as gay or bisexual. (Behaviour Patterns of Child Molesters, Erickson et al).
The popular Jewish homosexual activists Karla Jay and Allen Young reported in their ‘Gay Report’ that 73% of homosexuals are active ‘Chicken Hawks’, which means they prey on boys.
Homosexual teacher/pupil relations are also over 80% ‘boy love’. NAMBLA anyone? The North American Boy Love Association, in which they openly declare that parents are being spoiled sports by not letting their children explore their sexuality with dirty shitty-fingered old men.
I am sure you are well aware of the lovely alt right movement that is full of homosexuals, and Milo’s recent recollection of his first experience with a black transvestite gay man, and how this is really quite a good thing. More black cock, anyone? According to Milo Yiannopulus’ t-shirt, black cocks matters. This is pure and simple condoning sexual abuse and the normalization of pedophilia. Don’t you just love how the alt right movement only seems to be contributing to anal prolapses; maybe that is why they are so full of shit.
Anyone heard of the Stonewall charity? It is based on the Stonewall Inn, which was a popular hangout for LGBTs back in the day. It was also notorious for drug trafficking and sexual activity with boys under the age of 16, or if you live in my world, sexual abuse and pedophilia. Stonewall is the name of a cult LGBT awareness charity, how beautiful. True pedophiles, as they call them, normally like girls between 7-11 , in other words pre-pubescent, while gay men prefer boys to be 11-14, in the midst of puberty. Sexual conditioning? Some efforts to cure pedophiles are to get them to masturbate to normal material, which is reconditioning. So surely these homosexual men preying on teenage boys are also sexually conditioning them, to later spew out the proof it is unharmful, since some of those boys are now grown up gay and proud themselves. However, this just means that the children have been successfully conditioned. Other victims of abuse will end up be sickened by their trauma, with some taking their own lives because of it.
Bisexual man Alfred Kinsey, the godfather of modern perversion, followed in Freud’s footsteps, selling the psychoanalytic bullshit to the masses, like only an American man can. Well, an American man surrounded by more Jews than a synagogue. He told us that 37% of homosexuals had sex with underage children in his works, and he is possibly one of the very rare individuals who has circumcised himself. I discuss this filthy piece of shit because he gave the perception of the 1 in 10 gay man rule, and now we all believe 10% of men are homosexuals, but this is not true (except amongst jewish men). It was a propaganda tool used to destigmatise gay men.
A lot of his work discussed pedophilia and expressed not only the idea that children can have orgasms, but the apparent proof. See the table to the side of his gathered data from rapists and pedophiles, who happened to have timed and recorded their findings for Kinsey to record. This is academic sexual abuse, which is still today a way to get around legally watching or partaking in abuse, being a part of research which holds a ‘certificate of confidentiality’. The recent surge for understanding and formatting pedophilia prevention care may result in many more of such studies, although in Kinseys day he did not need any official sanctioning. He is still quoted today within schools for sex education purposes, as well as in psychology and psychiatry classes when discussing sexual behaviours. He was a chair on the board of the Rockefeller Foundation, his lawyers were Jewish, his best friend was Jewish, and he was an important member of the Jewish run Psychoanalytic movement, which brought about the “sexual liberation” of the fifties and sixties. He also had dealings with Jewish child rapist Rex King who he took notes from for his books. King was stated to have had sex with nearly every female member of his family.
Kinsey stopped the stigma for homosexuality and recently his work on children’s orgasms has resurfaced from the Kinsey institute, letting us all know that:
On April 23, 2014, the Kinsey Institute, whose founders argue that “children are sexual beings….sexual from the word go….sexual from birth,” was granted consultative status by the United Nations Committee on Non-governmental Organizations (CNO) of the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC). By creatively presenting the Institute’s history and mission in order to obtain its global lobbying status (see the discussioninfra), it follows in the footsteps of its founder Alfred C. Kinsey” (International centre on law, life, faith and family).
If you do not know who ECOSOC are, they are global advocates for progress on global norms who work within the United Nations. So an organization that was built on pedophilia is consulting with this UN group regarding legislation, and incidentally the Kinsey Institute has a home page featuring two hugging lesbians.
There is a clear link between LGBT and pedophilia. Soon, like with all of the politically correct “tolerance” bullshit, we will be forced to accept it all. They are telling us that children like sex, and that it is time we allowed them the freedom to express it. Their solution, I am sure, will be to lower the age limitations and accept what they call ‘true pedophiles’ and nurture them into wanting a child just a few years older, maybe younger looking ones.
This is some seriously sick conditioning, that started a long, long time ago. Are you worried yet? Peak Jew was when they all sat down and wrote our future, not when we realised it.
Portions taken from: The Free Thought Project
Tonight while in Piggly Wiggly with my sister and both my children (the oldest 20mos and the youngest 1month old today) while nursing a Deputy approached me right when I was about to leave and informed that I needed to cover up because someone might find it “offensive” I repeated the law back to him stating that Georgia state law says I can breastfeed however most comfortable wherever I want as long as I’m authorized to be there. He then grows flustered and says “No ma’am that’s not the case.” And I said “No I know what the law says” for him to say:
View original post 656 more words
With geo-engineering programs in full swing, no weather these days is natural. As I write this, I am starting to get hit by a massive hurricane, possibly a Category 5. The stormfront only started heading our way recently, when “Matthew” did a 90° turn on October 2nd.
View original post 675 more words
‘Jews are heriditary degenerate’ according to Richard Kraft-Ebing, who alongside many others came to the conclusion that the jewish race is inbred and because of this – delusional, insane and perverse. They suffer Neurasthenia, which ‘effects the jews with exceptional severity’. Jewish criminologist Cesare Lambroso claimed that 1 in 391 jews was a lunatic, which back in those days was four times higher than any other religion. These observations penned over a hundred years ago linked jews, inbreeding, disease and degeneracy.
This inbreeding is a phenomenon similar to that observed in certain highly aristocratic and wealthy families, whose members, whether from motives of honor or money constantly intermarry, and thus have many insane relatives” (Krafft-Ebbing).
Jews have been suffering type 1 and 2 diabetes for a not longer than Aryan man; diabetes was once called a judenkrankheit (a jewish disease). Because of a work project, I have been looking into type 2 diabetes and for those who did not know, as I did not, stress and diabetes go hand in hand. Under stress your body releases chemicals and glucose to get ready for fight or flight, but if the stress becomes chronic, we do not use up the glucose and the body has to store it, instead of using the fight or flight measures of protection. This results in high blood sugar, causing diabetes. This is something that was only seen en masse in jews a hundred years ago, but not in Europeans. Several scholars associated diabetes with jews and inbreeding.
The list to the right shows other nervous diseases that are more prevalent within the jew. I mention this because the incidence of mental health problems and diabetes are so well correlated, and both a big jewish problem for such a long time now, but a relatively recent problem for the European. Krafft-Ebing highlighted that the jews were not only suffering insanity from their religious delusions and inbred genetics, but were sexually perverse at a percentage very disproportionate with the Europeans they lived amongst. Although I may add I am suspicious that some jews themselves have clearly stated how mentally and physically ill they were in comparison to the Aryan, I assume they were (and still are) just getting in there to alter the reasoning for this phenomenon, like the jews are in foreign environments, often in overcrowded cities and of course there is their constant need to move as they have never been given an opportunity to settle, anti-semitism etc.
Other reasons for the fact that jews are more at risk of nervous diseases are: their religion requires more leisure time and they eat very rich foods. So in other words, they are unhealthy and lazy. We have an overwhelming amount of evidence that shows diabetes and overall ill health are linked to not exercising and eating food that is fatty, without any nutritional value. Environmental factors today, such as over eating and lack of exercise, are valid reasons for poor physical and mental well-being. But this correlation matches the environment of today, not 1880-1940.
However, whether it was a jewish academic or not recording these findings, the lists of illnesses that are higher within the jewish community is sometimes doubled statistically, so putting aside for a moment the causes for the correlations, the findings are there, and across the board shows that jews have poor mental and physical health at noticeably higher rates.
So the explanation from jews is mostly an environmental one. However, a few scholars claimed that the higher rates of mental and physical illness was in fact an internal one because of intermarriage. Although people debate what they meant by ‘inbreeding’, some scholars argue that inbreeding meant intermarry within one’s own tribe, not within one’s own immediate family or one’s close blood line. The word consanguineous alone can simply mean ancestry or ethnic descent, but in this context of marriage it means ‘blood’, so it is pretty clear that many scholars meant close family:
Some jewish scholars have defended the inbreeding and said it has aided the extraordinary IQ attributed to jews and that we should observe and learn from such cultural understandings. When presenting the evidence that jews are inbred and diseased, this is not flippancy or anti-semitism. Many academics of that time were disclosing how ‘hysteria’ and ‘intermarrying’ was commonplace amongst jews.
Not only is the jewish man’s mind attacked, but their body is discussed as often being misshaped and their feet flat footed, to the point were they could not uptake any physical activity, or be of any military value to the nation. Again the reasons given were that they were city dwellers, and it is debated whether or not with appropriate exercise their body would adapt to becoming one that can manage physical activity. Tay Sachs is a disease that jewish people often suffer, which is defined as “an inherited metabolic disorder in which certain lipids accumulate in the brain, causing spasticity and death in childhood”.
We are now told today that these views are outdated and inaccurate, but it was not just Kraepelin and Ebing supporting these views; many scholars from philosophy, medicine, psychiatry as well as religious figures gave their opinions, as well as jewish men themselves verifying the numbers of the ill and insane. Today we still have higher numbers of disease within the jew (and all immigrants for that matter), although the European men are fast catching pace living in the jews’ world, not only with their insanity and mental and physical illness, but with their highlighted lust for sexual perversions.
The accurate stereotype of the jew had been documented as ignorant, dirty and deviant, but then along came Freud to save them all by simply stating we were all like that. How silly of us! Phew, jew, that was a close one, we nearly thought you were all mentally and physically broken and soulless, possibly because you were all inbred. It seems, though, we were wrong and it is a good thing we are learning from the cultural enrichment that you so wonderfully offer us.
On mass degeneracy:
Emil Kraeplin suggested that hereditary degeneration among jews was most likely caused by their preference for consanguineous marriage. A syllogism is operating here: The insane are degenerates; the jews are insane; therefore the jews are degenerate.”
Scholars today may fight over the meaning of inbred, whether they meant tribe, second cousin or first, but the meaning of degenerate back then was conclusive; criminally sexually perverse with no morality. How odd to have that one word describe the jew, and its ending ‘generate’ describes me and you: